← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72555/2024bail granted

Ramu Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-07Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72555 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2024 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Ramu Manjhi Son of Late Uma Manjhi Resident of Village - Done Khurd, Dhodhya, P.S.- Darawli, District - Siwan.

2.

Vijay Singh Son of Late Sitasaran Singh Resident of Village - Chhotki Don Dhodhya, P.S.- Darawli, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Darawali P.S. Case No. 223 of 2024 dated 23.07.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 30(a), 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 100 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered near the Dhodhiya canal.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The said recovery has been made from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72555 of 2024(2) dt.07-10-2024 2/2 an open place that is accessible to anyone. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner no. 1 has four criminal cases and the petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 24.07.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Siwan in connection with Darawali P.S. Case No. 223 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T