← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39778/2017disposed

Birsen Chaudhary v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-08-232 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39778 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -763 Year- 2013 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Birsen Chaudhary, Son of Late Rambriksh Chaudhary, Resident of villageNiranjanbigha, P.S.- Dihri, District- Rohtas, Bihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shiva Kumari, Wife of Shivaji Chowdhary, Resident of Village Niranjanbigha, P.S.- Dihri, District- Rohtas, Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 23-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant-opposite party no.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

Considering the nature of allegations and possibility of settlement of dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party no.2, as petitioner has been alleged to have taken bank's loan on the land purchased by the Opposite Party No.2 from the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate V-cum- Sub-Judge-XIII, Rohtas at

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39778 of 2017 (2) dt.23-08-2017 2/2 Sasaram in connection Complaint Case No. 763 of 2013 for a period of six months for settlement of its dues with the bank. The petitioner will surrender before the learned Court below after six months and the provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed on the satisfaction of the learned Court below that all bank dues with regard to the house purchased by the Opposite Party No.2 has been settled by the petitioner. (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Arjun/- U T