Dhirendra Mehta @ Dhirendra Kumar Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15042 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -44 Year- 2002 Thana -JADIA District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Dhirendra Mehta @ Dhirendra Kumar Mehta Son of Jagdish Mehta Resident of Village- Jadia, P.S.- Jadia, District- Jadia. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar (App 220) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-04-2018 Heard.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Jadia P.S .Case No.44 of 2002 registered for an offence under Section 307 and other allied sections of the IPC. It has been submitted that one Upendra Kumar while repairing road by cutting soil, altogether eight accused persons armed with deadly weapon came and assaulted the informant for which a case and counter case have been lodged by both the parties. The allegation against the petitioner is omnibus and some of the accused persons have been allowed anticipatory bail by the court below itself. The injury allegedly caused have been found simple in nature and offence under Section 307 of the IPC is made out.

Learned APP opposed the submissions.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15042 of 2018 (2) dt.06-04-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJMIV, Supaul, District-Supaul in connection with Jadia P.S.Case No.44 of 2002, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T