Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67838/2025bail rejected

Azad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-24Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67838 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2024 Thana- YADOPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Azad Alam S/O Hanif Mian R/O Village- Sihorwa, P.S.- Yadopur, DistrictGopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sachina, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Yadopur P.S. Case no. 92 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under sections 379, 341, 323, 326, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and one another person is said to have struck the mother of the informant on the head with a daab.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Though the allegation is against two persons having assaulted, however, referring to the injury report in the order of the learned trial Court it is submitted that only one injury has been found.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67838 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 Further there is no repetition of blow. There is case and counter case between the parties, the case filed by petitioner's side being of earlier occasion.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner of having assaulted the mother of the informant with a daab together with the injury having been found to be grievous in nature, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks.

8. In case the petitioner surrenders in the learned Court below within the aforesaid time and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered on it's own merits without being prejudiced by this order of rejection.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U