Sushil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66663 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2022 Thana- LAURIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sushil Kumar Son of Raj Kishor Sah R/v- Juri Miya Ka Tola, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prithvi Nath Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-05-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No. 82 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 324, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.The prosecution story, in brief, is that the petitioner had snatched Mobile Phone, ATM Card and the Driving Licence of the informant, while he was returning after finishing his official work. Informant is employee of the HDFC Bank.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR, however, no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66663 of 2022(3) dt.17-05-2023 2/2 the prayer for bail.

6. Having considered the rival submission of the parties as well as the allegation made in the FIR against the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Lauriya P.S.Case no.82 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. Considering the fact that there are two criminal cases pending against the petitioner as mentioned in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, the petitioner is directed to give undertaking before the learned court below that in future he will not be involved in any illegal act.

8. With the above direction/observation, the present bail application is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U