Urdu College, Gopalganj Through Its Secretary Abul Kalam Abul Kalam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16475 of 2025 ====================================================== Urdu College, Gopalganj through its Secretary Abul Kalam Abul Kalam Son of Late Mahammad Hafizullah, Permanent Resident of Shaikh Mohalla, Police Station and Post Office - Siwan, District and Town - Siwan, Presently Resending at Mohalla - Marwari,, Police Station and Post Office - Gopalganj, Dist. and Town - Gopalganj, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director, Secondary Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.
3.
The Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary), through its Secretary, Buddh Marg, Lodipur, Patna.
4.
The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, (Senior Secondary), Buddh Marg, Lodipur, Patna.
5.
The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary), Buddh Marg, Lodipur, Patna.
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Rashid Izhar, Advocate For the Respondent State:
Standing Counsel (18) For the BSEB :
Mr. P.K.Sahi, Senior Advocate Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-11-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is a College represented through its Secretary seeking a direction upon the respondent Bihar School Examination Board (For short 'the Board') to take a final decision upon the approval of the Governing Body of the petitioner College, which was duly constituted vide its resolution dated 24.10.2024 and duly forwarded to the Board vide its letter dated 12.11.2024. Despite the decision taken by the Governing
Patna High Court CWJC No.16475 of 2025(2) dt.13-11-2025 2/2 Body and the same having been forwarded to the respondent Board for its approval, till date no decision has been taken compelling the petitioner to before approach this Court.
3. Learned Advocate for the Board seeks a short adjournment to apprise this Court with regard to the present position.
4. Having considered the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court instead of keeping the matter pending thinks it proper to dispose of the same with a direction to the respondents No. 3 and 5 to consider the request of the petitioner for approval to the constitution of Governing Body, as contained in Annexure-9, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
5. The writ petition stands disposed of with the direction and observation as aforesaid.
(Harish Kumar, J) Pawan/- U