Patna High CourtCWJC/24467/2013disposed

Fauni Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-25Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24467 of 2013 =========================================================== Fauni Kumari Wife of Sri Binod Kumar, resident of village:- Banjhi Pyar, P.S.:- Barhat, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Jamui

3. The District Superintendent of Education, Jamui

4. The District Programme Officer, Jamui

5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Barhat, Jamui

6. The Child Development Project Officer, Barhat, Jamui

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Barhat, Jamui

8. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Barhat, Jamui

9. Nitu Kumari wife of Dhananjay Kumar, Resident of Moh.- Chas Nala, P.S.:- Vharla, District:- Dhanbad (Jharkhand).

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat For the Respondent/s : M/s Sharad Kumar Sinha and Amit Kumar Anand =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is challenging the appointment of Respondent no. 9 as Anganwari Sevika for Banjhi Pyar, Center No.80, Ward No. 15, P.S.-Barhat, District.-Jamui raising allegation that Respondent no. 9 has wrongly been selected, leaving aside the persons who are above to her in the list, for that, petitioner has filed a complaint/application dated 16/9/2013, which is Annexure-5 series, before the District Magistrate, Jamui, but no action has been taken by

Patna High Court CWJC No.24467 of 2013 dt.25-02-2015 2/2 the Collector.

The Collector is the original authority to examine the grievance with regard to the selection of Anganwari Sevika. As the complaint has already been filed before the District Magistrate, Jamui he is directed to examine the case of the petitioner after giving notice to the private respondent and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law, if already not passed.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U