← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5220/2014dismiss for nonprosecution

Kishor Kumar Mishra v. The Union Of India And ORS

2018-08-28Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5220 of 2014 ====================================================== Kishor Kumar Mishra S/O- Late Bindeshwar Mishra, C/O- Raj Kumar Mishra, Resident Of House No. 103, Bijoli Shyama Apartment, Gorakh Nath Lane, Boring Canal Road, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India Through The Home Secretary, Govt. Of India, Central Secretariat, New Delhi

2. The Director General, Border Security Force, Block No. 10, C.G.O. Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi

3. The I.G. Bsf, Frontier H. Qrs. (Salbagan) North Tripura, Tripura

4. The Dig, Sector Head Quarters B.S.F. (Panisagar), P.O. + P.S.- Panisagar, District- North Tripura, State- Tripura, Pin- 799260

5. The Commandant 110 Battalion Bsf (Panisagar) P.O. + P.S.- Panisagar, District- North Tripura, State- Tripura, Pin- 799260 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-08-2018 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the Union of India is present.

Counsel for the Union of India submits that this is the second writ petition of the petitioner claiming the same relief. Raising an objection regarding maintainability of second writ petition for the same relief it has also been pointed out that since the petitioner had already been placed in the lower medical category in the year 1998 he is not entitled to any benefits under the Assured Career Progression Scheme which came into effect on

Patna High Court CWJC No.5220 of 2014 (6) dt.28-08-2018 2/2 01.08.1999.

Since non-appears on behalf of the petitioner, without going into the merits of the submissions made by counsel for the Union of India, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) Prakash/- U