← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66607/2025bail granted

Bipin Singh @ Vipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-27Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66607 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Bipin Singh @ Vipin Kumar S/O late Anandi Prasad R/O Vill.- Goni, P.O.- Bhadokhara, P.S.- Mufassil, Dist.- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Anand, Ms. Jaya Sonam, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Nawada Town P. S. Case No. 106 of 2025 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, marriage of informant's son Sonu Kumar (deceased) was solemnized with co-accused Priya Kumari and it is alleged that after one month of marriage, Priya Kumari went to her parent's home and took away all her jewellery, clothes and other stuffs with her. It is further alleged that son of the informant was also residing at his in-laws' home from the last six months, where behaviour of his in-laws with him was not cordial. It is further alleged that on 29.01.2025 at

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66607 of 2025(3) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 about 07:00 P.M., the informant got an information that his son has committed suicide. The informant suspects that this petitioner along with other co-accused persons have killed his son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he is father-in-law of the deceased. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and he is in custody since 06.05.2025.

5. However, learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, clean antecedent and period of custody, this bail application is allowed. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada Town P. S. Case No. 106 of 2025.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T