Rajesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81408 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2827 Year-2017 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== RAJESH SINGH Son of Dudhnath Singh Resident of Village - Rasulpur, P.O.- Belsand, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, Dist.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Phool Kumari Devi @ Ful Kumari Devi Wife of Rajesh Singh Resident of Village - Rasulpur, P.O.- Belsad, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, Dist.- Siwan, Presently residing as Daughter of Bhulan Jingh, Resident of Village - Satai Tola (Parsouda), P.S.- Mirganj, Distt.- Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey No.5 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar For the O.P. No. 2 Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 through video conferencing.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2827 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted by the parties that matrimonial relationship has been restored and both the parties are staying together.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81408 of 2019(13) dt.19-01-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 also submitted that though the matrimonial relationship has been restored, but the opposite party No. 2 apprehends that there may be some dispute in the near future.

This Court, in this case, cannot pass any order for supervision of the matrimonial relationship. The opposite party No. 2 is well aware of her legal rights in case the petitioner is found misbehaving or not maintaining her.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application is allowed.

Accordingly, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of ten weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate XVI, Gopalganj, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2827 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T