← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10236/2018disposed

Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.10236 of 2018 dt.12-07-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10236 of 2018 =========================================================== Rakesh Kumar Sharma, son of Late Prabhu Thakur, resident of Village- Madpo, Post- Lalpur, Police Station and Block- Kawakol, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Nawada.

4. The District Marketing Officer, Nawada.

5. The District Supply Officer, Nawada.

6. The Sub- Divisional Officer Razauli Sadar, District- Nawada.

7. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Nawada Sadar, District- Nawada. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. S. RAZA Ahmad, AAG-5 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-07-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to earmark the P.D.S. shop to the handicapped pursuant to advertisement no. 1 of 2017 issued for Nawada Sadar, SubDivision and advertisement no. 1 of 2017 for Razauli Sub-Division within the District of Nawada.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if the petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2018 (Annexure-7) filed before the District Magistrate, Nawada (Respondent No. 3) is directed to be disposed of, in which event, the

Patna High Court CWJC No.10236 of 2018 dt.12-07-2018 present writ petition need not be pressed on merits.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and has been heard.

4. Having regard to the nature of the grievances and the stand of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Nawada (Respondent No. 3) to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2018 (Annexure-7), if the same is pending before him, after grant of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 17.07.2018 Transmission Date N.A.