Raju Ram @ Raju Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67268 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2024 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== Raju Ram @ Raju Kumar Ram S/o Lalan Ram R/o Village- Matuk Chhapra, at present Village- Papaur, P.S.- Sarai, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 123, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of bringing cold drink is against Abhaynath and Aryan, who are alleged to have given the cold drink to the informant, who after drinking felt dizziness, and specific allegation of assault is against Deepak Tiwari of assaulting the informant by bamboo on his head causing injury. It is further submitted that as far as petitioner is concerned, no specific overt act is alleged against him. It is next submitted that even the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67268 of 2025(3) dt.02-12-2025 2/3 informant had accompanied Abhaynath and Aryan on 23.07.2024, at 09:20 p.m., and when they reached near a bridge where Deepak along with the petitioner and two others unknown were seen standing on the bridge, as such, it is submitted that apart from the fact that petitioner was seen at the bridge no specific allegation is alleged against him. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Pachrukhi (Sarai O.P.) P.S. Case No. 340 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

6. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, namely, Lalan Ram.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67268 of 2025(3) dt.02-12-2025 3/3

7. However, if the investigating officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T