Gajmal Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67049 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2025 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Gajmal Ram son of Late Munni Lal Ram Resident of Village- Gopipatiyaon, P.S.-M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 2.
Parma Ram Son of Late Munni Lal Ram Resident of Village- Gopipatiyaon, P.S.-M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 3.
Suraj Kumar Ram @ Saroj Kumar Ram Son of Parma Ram Resident of Village- Gopipatiyaon, P.S.-M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 4.
Binay Kumar Ram son of Parma Ram Resident of Village- Gopipatiyaon, P.S.-M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 5.
Roshan Kumar Ram @ Raushan Kumar Ram@ Roshan Kumar son of Parma Ram Resident of Village- Gopipatiyaon, P.S.-M.H. Nagar, DistrictSiwan 6.
Vishal Kumar @ Vishal Kumar Ram Son of Gajmal Ram Resident of Village- Gopipatiyaon, P.S.-M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 7.
Bikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar Ram son of Gajmal Ram Resident of Village- Gopipatiyaon, P.S.-M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 8.
Abhishek Kumar Ram Son of Suman Ram Resident of VillageGopipatiyaon, P.S.-M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 9.
Manish Kumar Ram @ Rajnish Kumar Ram Son of Suman Ram Resident of Village- Gopipatiyaon, P.S.-M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raghav Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67049 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/3
3. As per FIR, on 08.05.2025 at about 8:00 A.M, the informant was filling soil on her land, in the meantime, all the accused persons named in the F.I.R. including petitioners came and asked her to register the land in question in their favour and on objection raised by informant and her family members, petitioners along with other co-accused persons abused and assaulted them with lathi-danda and rod, as a result of which, six persons from informant's family sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both parties are pattidars. There is general & omnibus allegation. Case and counter case. Except the injuries, sustained by one Kashi Ram, all other injuries, sustained by other injured persons, are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the fact that there is case & counter case as also the fact that both sides sustained injuries and clean antecedent of petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67049 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 3/3 Class, Siwan in connection with Andar P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T