Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69346/2025bail rejected

Kyas Bind v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-20Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69346 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2021 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Kyas Bind S/o Narayan Bin R/o Village- Piprahi, P.S.- Uchkagaon, DistrictGopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subhash Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-02-2026 Heard Mr. Subhash Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Uchkagaon P.S.Case No.358 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner in an organized manner committed theft of huge quantity of gold and silver jewelleries and other ornaments from the Jewellery Shop. The allegation is supported by the material, which has surfaced during the course of the investigation. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents of similar nature.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 69346 of 2025(5) dt.20-02-2026 2/2 been falsely implicated in the present case.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and the previous criminal antecedent of the petitioner, who is involved in other cases of similar nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on pre-arrest bail.

7. However, if the petitioner so advised, he may surrender before the learned district court and seek regular bail.

8. The learned District Court is directed to consider the bail application of the petitioner on the same day and pass necessary order on the basis of materials available on the record in accordance with law.

9. With the above observation/direction, the present application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U T