← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71129/2025dismissed

Md. Saddam @ Md. Saddam Huassin v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71129 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-779 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Saddam @ Md. Saddam Huassin Son of Late Md. Salauddin @ Md. Salahuddin Resident of Village - Naharpar, Phulwarisharif, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Uday Prasad , Advocate For the State :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Jagjit Roshan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. At the outset, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have submitted that the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable as vide order dated 08.08.2025, proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner has got three criminal antecedents. In this connection, reliance is placed upon recent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71129 of 2025(2) dt.28-11-2025 2/2 judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Prem Shankar Prasad versus the State of Bihar and Another reported in LL 2021 SC 579.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the fact that proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued and judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Prem Shankar Prasad (supra), the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T