Sujeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2335 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16610 of 2021 ====================================================== Sujeet Kumar Son of Ram Pramod Sahni Resident of Village- Bokhra, Post Office- Bokhra, Police Station- Bokhra, District- Sitamarhi, Ex- Ministercum-Cashier, Bokhra Block Fisheries Co-operative Societies Limited, Bokhra, Police Station- Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Dr. N. Shrawan Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna- 800001. 2.
Dr. N. Shrawan Kumar The Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna- 800001.
3.
Md. Nishad Ahmed The Director, Fisheries, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat Building, Patna- 800015.
4.
Mr. Umesh Ranjan The Deputy Director, Fisheries, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat Building, Patna- 800015.
5.
Mr. Manesh Kumar Mina The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 6.
Mr. Shambhu Prasad Nayak The District Fisheries Officer-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Sitamarhi.
7.
Smt. Pushpa Kumari The Circle Officer, Bokhra Block, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha (Sc19) Mr. Atul Shankar, AC to SC 19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2025 This is an application for initiating contempt proceeding against the O.P. No. 6 for deliberate and wilful violation of the order of this Court dated 29.06.2022, 27.07.2022 and 19.09.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 16610 of 2021.
2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the
Patna High Court MJC No.2335 of 2022(7) dt.04-04-2025 2/2 petitioner that this application has become infructuous and hence he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U