Quess Corp Limited, v. The State Of Bihar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14855 of 2024 ====================================================== Quess Corp Limited, a listed Company having its registered office at Ques House, 3/3/2 Bellandur Gate, Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru, P.O and P.SBellandur, District Bengaluru, State Karnataka through its authorized representative Shri Nitin Dave, Chief Executive Officer, General Staffing, a vertical of Quess Corp Limited, Male aged about 51 years, S/o Pradeep Kumar Dave, resident of Villa 8, Stellar Sigma Apartments Sigma 4, Kaasna, P.O and P.S Kaasna, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, 201310. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Labour Resources Department, 5th Floor, A Wing, Niyojan Bhawan, Near Income Tax Office, Patna- 800001.
2.
The Bihar Skill Development Mission, Department of Labour Resources, Govt. of Bihar through Mission Director, 5th Floor, A Wing, Niyojan Bhawan, Near Income Tax Office, Patna- 800001. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr.Kanishka Shankar, Advocate Mr. Aditya, Advocate Mr. Aviral, Advocate Mr. Ayush Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Ajay, GA-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 07-10-2024 The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, on being pointed out the specific clause for termination of default by the Bihar Skill Development Mission (BSDM) at 7.1 of the agreement, submits that he would withdraw the writ petition and approach the authority, before whom termination is being
Patna High Court CWJC No.14855 of 2024 dt.07-10-2024 2/2 challenged, for consideration of the withdrawal of the debarment also. There was also a contention raised of the agreement providing for blacklisting; while the Department has debarred the petitioner, which cannot be sustained, since both has the same meaning & consequence.
2. With the liberty aforesaid, the writ petition stands closed.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Sujit/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 08.10.2024 Transmission Date