← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2617/2017dismissed

Rajendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through Binay Kumar, The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Departme

2019-07-17Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2617 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16494 of 2016 ====================================================== Rajendra Yadav son of late Domi Yadav resident of village - Shani Tola, Ward No. 15, Post - Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through Binay Kumar, The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

Binay Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Dept. of Public Health Engineering Bihar, Patna.

3.

Ravi Mittal, The Principal Secretary Finance Dept. Bihar, Patna. 4.

Dr. D.S. Gangwar, The Principal Secretary General Administrative Dept. Bihar, Patna.

5.

Dineshwar Prasad Singh, the Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Depa 6.

Raghav Jee Ram, the Chief Engineer Mechanical, Public Health Engineering, Bihar, Patna.

7.

The Zonal Chief Engineer, Bhagalpur Zone Department of Public Health Engineering, Bhagalpur.

8.

Satendra Prasad, the Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Circle, Begusarai.

9.

Ramjee Jha, the Superintending Engineer Public Health Circle, Saharsa. 10.

Rajeev Kumar, the Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Khagaria. 11.

Prabhat Kumar, the District Account Officer, Khagaria. 12.

Prabhat Kumar, the Treasury Officer Khagaria. 13.

S. Suresh Kumar, the Accountant General A and E, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Siyaram Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad - AAG 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

This application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for initiating a contempt

Patna High Court MJC No.2617 of 2017(4) dt.17-07-2019 2/2 proceeding against the opposite parties for their willful violation and disobedience to the order dated 23.02.2017 passed in CWJC No.16494 of 2016.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during pendency of the application, the order dated 23.02.2017 passed in CWJC No.16494 of 2016 has been fully complied with.

In view of the submission made above, no case for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties is made out. The application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- U