← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3889/2019withdrawn

Kailash Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-24Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah,Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3889 of 2019 Arising out of Letters Patent Appeal No.945 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Kailash Kumar Singh Son of Late Jhagaru Singh Resident of At and P.O.- Motipur, P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur.

2.

Tribhuwan Prasad Son of Late Ram Sakal Roy Resident of At and P.O.- Baghi, P.S. and District- Samastipur.

3.

Ajeet Kumar Son of Bhola Prasad Sah Resident of At and P.O.- Motipur, P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur.

4.

Neel Kamal Neeraj Son of Sri Ram Shreshtha Sah Resident of VillageMethrapur, P.O.- Madhopur, Disgharua, P.S. Thajpur, District- Samastipur. 5.

Rajesh Kumar Pandey Son of Sri Bhubnesh Pandey Resident of Village and P.O.- Bherokhara, P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Birendra Narayan, The District Education Officer, Samastipur, DistrictSamastipur. 4.

Mr. Pramod Sahu, The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Samastipur, District- Samastipur.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh (GA 12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR) 24-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present contempt application, the order under contempt has been complied with

Patna High Court MJC No.3889 of 2019(3) dt.24-01-2023 2/2 and, as such, the matter has become infructuous.

3. Learned counsel for the State reiterates and affirms the statements made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. In view of the above, the present contempt application stands disposed off.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) ( Harish Kumar, J) uday/shivank U