Md. Sakir @ Sakir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68538 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2025 Thana- Kachna District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.
Md. Sakir @ Sakir son of Late Sarfuddin Resident Of Village- Guwagaon, Ps -Kachna, Dist -Katihar 2.
Md. Mokarram @ Mukarram Ali Son of Md. Nurul Resident Of VillageGuwagaon, Ps -Kachna, Dist -Katihar 3.
Md. Seharul Haque @ Md. Seharul son of Late Sarfuddin Resident Of Village- Guwagaon, Ps -Kachna, Dist -Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. The allegation in the first information report is that all the accused persons including the present petitioners indulged in abuses and assault upon the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and the informant are next door neighbours and on a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68538 of 2025(2) dt.26-09-2025 2/3 very trivial dispute with regard to drying of maize crops, quarrel took place between the parties for which case and counter case have been lodged. The case lodged on the side of the petitioners has been annexed as Annexure-2 and it has also been stated that petitioner no.1 had received grievous injury in the said transaction. It is further submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioners have not produced any serious injuries on the informant rather the injury report would disclose that the injuries suffered by the informant are all simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object as would be evident from the bail rejection order itself.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the grant of anticipatory bail.
6. Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid and also considering that the petitioners are next door neighbours, existence of case and counter case and also considering the simple nature of injuries, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68538 of 2025(2) dt.26-09-2025 3/3 court in connection with Kachna P.S. Case No.33 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) Sanjay/- U T