Md. Tajmul v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77129 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2019 Thana- SAHARSA RAIL P.S District- Khagaria ====================================================== Md. Tajmul, aged about 40 years (Male), Son of Late Md. Ainul @ Ajul Resident of Village- Ahmadpur, Ward No. 16, P.S.- Jogbani, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Saharsa Rail P.S. Case No. 09 of 2019 [G.R. (R) Case No. 84 of 2019] arising out of Patna Rail P.S. Case No. 00/18 registered for offences under sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The present case has been registered against unknown accused person on the basis of written report of the Informant alleging therein that while she was going to Patna by train, her mobile, kept in her bag, got missing. The Informant, a passenger, lodged a case in this regard before the Railway Police being Patna Rail P.S. Case No. 00/18 and, later on, it was found that the mobile was being used by the wife of the present petitioner. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 06.07.2019. Looking to the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77129 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Railway, Khagaria in connection with Saharsa Rail P.S. Case No. 9 of 2019 [G.R. (R) No. 84 of 2019) arising out of Patna Rail P.S. Case No. 00/18 subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below.

In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds and (iv) the petitioner will report to the Saharsa Rail police station by 7th of every month for at least six months and in case of failure without any valid rhyme or reason, the bail of the petitioner will be treated to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T