Ram Bahadur Chaupal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72266 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2022 Thana- GHANSHYAMPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

RAM BAHADUR CHAUPAL Son of Late Chulahai Chaupal R/v- Pali, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga 2.

BACHCHAN CHAUPAL Son of Late Thakko Chaupal R/v- Pali, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga 3.

ASHARFI CHAUPAL Son of Late Baldeo Chaupal R/v- Pali, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga 4.

PRABHU CHAUPAL Son of Late Baldeo Chaupal R/v- Pali, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga 5.

SUMIT CHAUPAL Son of Ram Chaupal R/v- Pali, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Ghanshyampur P.S. Case No.121 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Accusation against the petitioners is of assaulting the informant's sides by means of lathi, danda and farsa causing injuries to them.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72266 of 2022(2) dt.21-03-2023 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides sustained injuries. It is also submitted that the injuries were found simple in nature, which is clear from the impugned order itself.

The learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Considering the nature of injuries, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., 1st, Biraul, Darbhanga in connection with Ghanshyampur P.S. Case No.121 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) S.KUMAR/- U T