Puja Devi @ Puja Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69083 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2022 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Puja Devi @ Puja Kumari W/O Kishore Singh Resident Of Village- Narar Navtoli, P.S.- Kaluahi District- Madhubani.
2.
Ram Kumari Devi W/O Thakkan Singh Resident Of Village- Narar Navtoli, P.S.- Kaluahi District- Madhubani.
3.
Thakkan Singh S/O Late Jaldhari Singh Resident Of Village- Narar Navtoli, P.S.- Kaluahi District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioners rather 121.88 liters of foreign liquor is said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioners. He submits that the husband of the petitioner no. 1 was apprehended on the spot who disclosed the name of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69083 of 2022(2) dt.23-12-2022 2/2 petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 94 of 2022.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T