Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11860/2018bail granted

Rayeesh Yadav @ Raeish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-27Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11860 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11860 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -756 Year- 2017 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Rayeesh Yadav @ Raeish Yadav, s/o. Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithilesh Singh, r/o. vill. Motichowk, p.S. Khagaul, Dist. Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2017 in connection with Jehanabad (Korauna O.P.) P.S. Case No. 756 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Section 399/402 IPC and Sections 25(1-B) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with alleged recovery of one country made pistol and three live cartridges. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody since 06.11.2017 already suffered, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge I, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad (Korauna O.P.) P.S. Case No. 756 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11860 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018 (ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T