Md. Shamshad @ Sonu @ Baigan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7517 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAJEKALA District- PATNA ====================================================== Md. Shamshad @ Sonu @ Baigan, Son of Iftekar @ Md. Ish-hak Resident of Mohalla-Hoda Saheb ka Fatak, P.S. Khajekalan, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-03-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Khajekalan P.S.Case No. 98 of 2017 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.
Allegation in brief is that deceased, a criminal, was assaulted by the accused persons named in the FIR. Submission is that informant a police personnel is not an eye witness and he has not disclosed who named the petitioner and the deceased was a notorious criminal of the area moreover petitioner seeks bail on the ground of parity as one of the similarly situated coaccused Md. Aarif has been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 14.12.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 58459 of 2017 as well as another co-accused Tanvir Alam by
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7517 of 2018 (3) dt.14-03-2018 2/2 this Court by order dated 01.02.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4289 of 2018.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Md. Shamshad @ Sonu @ Baigan, is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. District Judge-IV, Patna City in connection with Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 98 of 2017 with condition that one of the bailor must be his close family member. Petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without any medical urgency, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled. (Arun Kumar, J) Sujit/- U T