Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68676/2023bail rejected

Sourav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68676 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2023 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Sourav Kumar Son Of Prakash Yadav Resident Of Village - Gabhu Kitta, P.S. - Rajoun, District - Banka ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Malendu, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 19-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajgaon P.S. Case No. 306 of 2023 lodged under Sections 25(1B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, 1959.

3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioner with allegation that the recovery of two desi katta and one live cartridges have alleged to be made from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that his name has figured in this case only due to the reason that there are 6 criminal cases pending against the petitioner.

5. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68676 of 2023(2) dt.19-10-2023 2/2 in custody is since 24.06.2023. He further submits that there are 6 criminal cases pending against the petitioner and he is on bail in 4 cases and in rest cases, he is persuading for bail.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean.

7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected, but liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T