← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67243/2025allowed

Ramji Paswan @ Ramjee Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-17Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67243 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2025 Thana- KORANSARAI District- Buxar ====================================================== Ramji Paswan @ Ramjee Paswan S/o Late Kawal Paswan @ Kaval Paswan R/o Village - Murar, P.S - Murar, District - Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Parmanand Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Koransarai P.S. Case No. 89 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the informant was sleeping after having dinner at his door. Suddenly, a man came and stabbed him with a knife in his abdomen. The informant raised an alarm, and the accused fled away.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67243 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that there is only suspicion that the petitioner might have stabbed the informant but from perusal of the order of the trial court, it is clear that there was some dispute regarding cash between the parties. It has also been submitted that no one has seen the petitioner stabbing the informant. The case is based on suspicion. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 24.07.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Koransarai P.S. Case No. 89 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T