Sandeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71874 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2023 Thana- BANGAWON District- Saharsa ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar S/o Devan Yadav R/o Village- Sahuriya East, P.S.- Sour Bazar, Dist.- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant. 2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. No. 40/2024, arising out of Bangaon P.S. Case No. 100 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 34, 302 of the IPC & Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3.

As per the prosecution case, the named criminals and some unknown criminals went to the house of the deceased and dragged Md. Mister from the first floor and they started beating him. When the brother of the informant's husband Md. Sulo came to save him, a shot fired by Suman Yadav which hit the deceased Md. Suo he was injured. During investigation, witnesses have stated that the petitioner was one of the accused who had gone in the first floor along with other

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71874 of 2024(2) dt.04-12-2024 2/2 criminals and dragged Md. Mister and assaulted him. It has also come during investigation that the petitioner and others were hired to kill Md. Mister but Md. Sulo was killed. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner has been made accused on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is in jail since 16.10.2023.

5.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail by contending that petitioner was also involved in the killing of deceased Md. Sulo. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and the serious allegation levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.

Accordingly, the application of the petitioner for grant of regular bail is rejected.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T