Shubham Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70247 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2023 Thana- AZIMABAD District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Shubham Kumar S/O Brijbihari Singh R/O Village- Udwantnagar, P.SAzimabad, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, APP For the Mines :
Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Adv.
Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwary, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-05-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Azimabad P.S. Case No. 58 of 2023 registered under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, petitioner is the owner of the tractor in which illegal sand was loaded.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 40,000/- to the Mining Department.
5. Considering the aforesaid contention made on behalf of the petitioner, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70247 of 2023(3) dt.07-05-2024 2/2 weeks from today, be enlarged on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate-I, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Azimabad P.S. Case No. 58 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. with direction to the petitioner that :- i. Petitioner shall deposit Rs. 40,000/- (Forty Thousand) through Bank Draft to the Mining Department and will produce the receipt of the same at the time of furnishing bail-bond, failing which, the learned Court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.
6. It is made clear that this order has been passed only for the purpose of bail, without going into the merit of the case. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T