Bablu Hansda @ Bablu Hasda v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67907 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2025 Thana- Anandpur District- Banka ====================================================== Bablu Hansda @ Bablu Hasda S/o Andhi Hansda Resident of village - Mathuriya (Simratarn), P.S - Anandpur, District - Banka (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Anamika Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Anandpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2025 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 61(2) read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

03. As per prosecution case, while the informant had been sleeping outside his house, someone shot him in his backside in the dead of night. The informant named this petitioner and other co-accused persons who might have committed this offence.

04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67907 of 2025(3) dt.05-01-2026 2/3 case. Learned counsel further submits that the FIR has been lodged with completely vague averment. The informant is covillager of the petitioner and there is previous enmity between them. The petitioner has been named merely on suspicion. No one has seen the occurrence and no material has come up on record against the petitioner to show his involvement in the alleged occurrence. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is having clean antecedent. The petitioner is in custody since 22.06.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted.

05. Learned APP for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the completely vague nature of allegation and further considering the period of custody of the petitioner and his clean antecedent along with submission of charge-sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka/court concerned in connection with Anandpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2025, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS and the following

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67907 of 2025(3) dt.05-01-2026 3/3 conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ashish/- U T