Praveen Yadav @ Bagi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5465 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2008 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ====================================================== Praveen Yadav @ Bagi, son of Shiva Yadav, Resident of Village- Lahuari, Police Station- Barachatti, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Neerad Parashar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 14.12.2017 in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No.16 of 2008 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 435, 436 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was totally unaware of the initiation of the present case and was suddenly taken into custody. Apart from the present case, he has no criminal antecedents. He further submits that the petitioner will co-operate in the trial and will not tamper with any evidence.

Considering the aforementioned facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5465 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018 2/2 circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Sherghati( Gaya), in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No.16 of 2008, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T