Ramchandar Bhandari @ Mali v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70810 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Ramchandar Bhandari @ Mali S/O Late Newa Mali Village- Sugapatti Balua Kachhari Tola, Ps. Phulparas, Dist. Madhubani 2.
Kalyani Devi W/O Pawan Bhandari @ Pawan Mali @ Pawan Kumar Village- Sugapatti Balua Kachhari Tola, Ps. Phulparas, Dist. Madhubani 3.
Pawan Bhandari @ Pawan Mali @ Pawan Kumar S/O Sri Ramchandar Mali @ Ram Chandra Bhandari Village- Sugapatti Balua Kachhari Tola, Ps. Phulparas, Dist. Madhubani 4.
Dinesh Bhandari @ Subhash Mali S/O Sri Ramchandar Mali @ Ram Chandra Bhandari Village- Sugapatti Balua Kachhari Tola, Ps. Phulparas, Dist. Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rammani Devi W/O Arun Bhandari Village- Sugapatti Kachhari Tola, Ps. Phulparas, Dist. Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Petitioners, who are in-laws of opposite party no2., are said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70810 of 2023(2) dt.28-11-2023 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that the petitioners are living separately from the informant and her husband from ten years. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mahila (Madhubani) P.S. Case No. 58 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T