Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62817/2019dismissed

Ram Babu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62817 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-473 Year-2018 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

RAM BABU SHARMA Son of Vishwanath Sharma Resident of VillageRampur, P.S-Sahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur. 2.

Brajesh Singh Son of Bharat Singh Resident of Village-Jahura, P.SSahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur. 3.

Dhananjay Mishra Son of Dayanand Mishra Resident of Village-Ahiyapur, P.S-Sahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur.

Braj Mohan Kumar Son of Dinesh Sahni Resident of Village-Madhopur Hajari, P.S-Sahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur.

Rambabu Kumar Son of Ramchandra Ram Resident of Village-Rampur Bhikhanpura, P.S-Sahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur. 6.

Dinesh Yadav Son of Nawal Rai Resident of Village-Madhopur Hajari, P.SSahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar @ S.K.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 473/18, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 149, 342, 353, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 /4 of Awashyak Seva Adhiniyam. Allegation against the petitioners and others is of creating road blockade and the photographs specifically disclosed the participation of the petitioners in the occurrence. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62817 of 2019(2) dt.15-10-2019 2/2 that they have no criminal antecedent and have falsely been implicated in this case and no motive behind the occurrence has been assigned.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners rather petitioners may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below will dispose of the same on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by this order.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T