Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59862/2019bail granted

Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-24Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59862 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-348 Year-2018 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== SONU KUMAR Son of Pramod Sharma @ Pramod Kumar Resident of Village- Ghosi, P.S.- Ghosi in the District of Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 24-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 186, and 353 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 348 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against as many as 8 named and 17 unknown persons. There is no overt act against the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents

4. Be that as it may, in the event of petitioner's arrest or surrender before court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-1-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,-1, Jehanabad in connection with Ghosi P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59862 of 2019(2) dt.24-09-2019 2/2 Case No. 348 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T