← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14302/2017dismissed

Abdul Alim Khan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-05-22Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14302 of 2017 ====================================================== Abdul Alim Khan Son of Late Abdul Halim Khan Resident of Village and Post Office - Bantara, P.S. - Deokund, District - Aurangabad Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Minor Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Aurangabad. 4.

The Accountant General, Birchand Patel Path, Bihar, Patna. 5.

Hazra Khatoon 1st wife of Abdul Alim Khan Resident of Village and Post Office - Bantara, P.S. Deokund, District - Aurangabad. 6.

Smt. Hamisha Khatoon @ Hamish Khatoon 2nd of Abdul Alim Khan Resident of Village and Post Office - Bantara, P.S. - Deokund, District - Aurangabad Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shakib Ayaz For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sita Ram Yadav - GP16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-05-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the State, and the learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar.

The petitioner filed this writ petition for a direction to the respondents to incorporate the name of second wife of the petitioner in his P.P.O. bearing P.P.O. No. 414331 dated 18.10.2004.

Counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the respondent No. 3. The Executive Engineer wrote letter to the Senior

Patna High Court CWJC No.14302 of 2017(3) dt.22-05-2020 2/2 Accounts Officer, Accountant General Office to insert the name of second wife of the petitioner in the pension papers of the petitioner. Consequently, the Senior Accounts Officer wrote letter to the Treasury Officer, Aurangabad to insert the name of second wife of the petitioner in the P.P.O. of petitioner. In this view of the fact, the writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as has become infructuous.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U