Hare Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74211 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2024 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== Hare Ram Singh Son of Late Yogi Singh @ Ram Yogi Singh Resident of Village- Badaka Dhakaich, P.S.- Krishna Braham, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Rai Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2.

The petitioner is seeking for bail in connection with Simri P.S. Case No.68 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

As per the FIR, during the course of area patrolling, a beheaded corpse was found. The informant requested to people who had gathered there to identify the dead body but they could not identify the dead body as the same was headless. The petitioner and other co-accused is said to have been involved in the killing of that person.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. There is no eye wit-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74211 of 2024(3) dt.13-12-2024 2/2 ness to the alleged occurrence. It is further submitted that there is contradictory statement of the witnesses in the case diary. There is no material available against the petitioner. Petitioner has been made accused merely on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in jail since 30.07.2024.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

8.

However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer of bail after framing of charge.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T