← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2794/2017dismiss for nonprosecution

Dani Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Kaushal Kumar, District Magistrate, Nawada And ORS

2024-09-19Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2794 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18168 of 2015 ====================================================== Dani Yadav, Son of Late Lachhoo Yadav, Resident of Village- Lembuya, P.S. Kashichak, District- Nawada (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Kaushal Kumar, District Magistrate, Nawada.

2.

Mr. Kaushal Kumar, District Magistrate, Nawada. 3.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Sub-Divisional Officer, Kashichak, District- Nawada. 4.

Mr. Amit Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Kashichak, Nawada. 5.

Mr. Amit Kumar, the Circle Officer, Kashichak, District- Nawada. 6.

Mr. Abhimanu Prasad, the Panchayat Secretary, Rewra Jagdishpur Gram Panchayat, Gram Panchayat Raj, Nawada, District-Nawada. ... ... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

None.

For the State :

Mr. Anjani Kumar AAG-4.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 19-09-2024 On 01.08.2024, we have passed the following orders: "Petitioner is hereby directed to furnish a copy of the BPL before the next date of hearing, failing which we would confirm the decision of the respondents to the extent that one of the criteria for extending pension under Indira Gandhi National Old Pension Scheme is a person must be having a BPL Card. If the same is not produced before the next date of hearing, the present petition would be

Patna High Court MJC No.2794 of 2017(5) dt.19-09-2024 2/2 dismissed.

2. Re-list this matter on 22.08.2024."

2. Thereafter, on 22.08.2024, we have passed the following orders:

"For compliance of the order dated 01.08.2024 finally four weeks' time is granted. Failing which petition would be dismissed on the next date of hearing.

2. Re-list this matter on 19.09.2024."

3. Today matter was called twice. None appears for the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, the present M.J.C./Contempt Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) P.S./- U