Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73779/2024dismissed

Ujjawal Kumar @ Avinash Kumar @ Ujjawal v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-20Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73779 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-454 Year-2023 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ujjawal Kumar @ Avinash Kumar @ Ujjawal Son of Shivjee Prasad @ Sheojee Prasad R/O Village- Ramgarhiya, Mitha Kunwa (Mirachak), P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail as earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 10.01.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 83773 of 2023 which reads as under:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner who is the husband of the deceased is in custody since 06.06.2023 in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 454 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, in a marriage of December, 2022, the girl is alleged to have been killed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73779 of 2024(3) dt.20-02-2025 2/2 deceased has committed suicide. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. He next submits that the deadbody of the deceased has been recovered by the police, post mortem has been done and the allegation is of killing the deceased for demand of dowry.

6. Considering the nature of the allegations and the nature of injuries sustained by the victim, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

7. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial."

4. In the trial, only officials witnesses are left to be examined and considering the same, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur is directed to see to it that the witnesses are produced before the trial Court on the dates fixed so that the petitioner, who is in jail, shall not suffer.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U