Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1099/2013dismissed

Uday Kumar Patel v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Bihar, Pat

2015-01-07Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1099 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Uday Kumar Patel Son Of Late Rajendra Mandal Resident Of VillageHalimpur, P.S.- Naya Ram Nagar, District- Munger (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. The Inspector General Of Police, Bhagalpur

4. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Munger

5. The Superintendent Of Police, Munger

6. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Munger

7. The Station House Officer, Naya Rampur, P.S.- Munger

8. The Officer-Incharge, Safiabad O.P. Munger

9. Surendra Kumar Patel Resident Of Village- Halimpur, P.S.- Naya Ram Nagar, District- Munger

10. Urmila Devi Wife Of Sri Surendra Kumar Patel Resident Of VillageHalimpur, P.S.- Naya Ram Nagar, District- Munger

11. Pinku Kumar Patel Son Of Sri Surendra Kumar Patel Resident Of Village- Halimpur, P.S.- Naya Ram Nagar, District- Munger

12. Madhukar Kumar Patel Son Of Sri Surendra Kumar Patel Resident Of Village- Halimpur, P.S.- Naya Ram Nagar, District- Munger

13. Sudhakar Kumar Patel Son Of Sri Surendra Kumar Patel Resident Of Village- Halimpur, P.S.- Naya Ram Nagar, District- Munger .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gautam Bose ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-01-2015 In the instant writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has raised several disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated in a summary proceeding. I also find that the petitioner has other alternative and efficacious remedy available in law. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1099 of 2013 (2) dt.07-01-2015 2/2 entertain the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- U T