Anu Ranjan Kumar Mishra @ Anuranjan Kr. Mishra v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18260 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-416 Year-2014 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Anu Ranjan Kumar Mishra @ Anuranjan Kr. Mishra, Son of Shashi Bhushan Mishra, R/o Village Damodar Chapra P.O. Basatpur Patti, P.S. Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Chanchal Devi Wife of Anu Ranjan Kumar Mishra, D/o Binod Kumar Mishra, R/o Village Damodar Chapura, P.S. Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur, at Present R/o Village Bakhara, P.S. Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Vidyarthi For the Opposite Party/s :

SMT. ASHA DEVI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 498(A), 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A IPC.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2017 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18260 of 2018(2) dt.29-03-2018 2/2 witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned learned S.D.J.M., West, Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur Complaint Case No. 416 of 2014 (Tr. No. 2420/2017).

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T