← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15173/2017dismissed

Sawita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2021-03-03Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15173 of 2017 ====================================================== Sawita Kumari Wife of Yogendra Pandit, Resident of Lakhisarai Mahto Tola, P.S.-District-Lakhisarai, Posted as Sevika in Anganbari Centre no. 57 Makuna Ward no. 1429, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Lakhisarai, DistrictLakhisarai, Bihar. 2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger. 3.

The District Programme Officer Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. 4.

The District Welfare Officer, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. 5.

The District Statistical Officer, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. 7.

The Child Development project Officer, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. 8.

The Ward-Councellor Ward No. 1429, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai 9.

Gayatri Kumari Wife of Binod Mahto, resident of Lakhisarai Mahto Tola, P.S.-Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. At Present Posted as Sevika in Centre no. 57 Makuna, P.S. and District-Lakhisarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Niranjan Parihar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Mandal -Sc3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2021 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty to approach the Appellate Authority by filing appropriate appeal against the order dated 09.08.2017 passed by the District Programme Officer, Lakhisarai.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed, however, with

Patna High Court CWJC No.15173 of 2017(3) dt.03-03-2021 2/2 liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate appeal before the Appropriate Authority against the aforesaid order dated 09.08.2017 passed by the District Programme Officer, Lakhisarai, in case such an appeal has not been filed earlier.

It is needless to state that in case, an appeal, as aforesaid, is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of on merits in accordance with law, without the Appellate Authority being impeded by the issue of limitation.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U