Md. Moizuddin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14878 of 2017 ====================================================== Md. Moizuddin S/o Md. Mojibur Rahman, Resident of Village-Bhakhri, P.O. Mohalbar, P.S. Dagarwa, District-Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar

2. The State Appellate Authority, Education Department, Bihar, 5C-D, Niyojan Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna

3. The Director Primary Education Govt. of BIhar, Patna.

4. Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Purnea.

5. The District Education Officer, District-Purnea.

6. The District Programme Officer, Establishment,Purnea, District-Purnea.

7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Dagarwa, District-Purnea.

8. Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Kohila, P.S. Dagarwa, District-Purnea.

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Kohila, P.S. Dagarwa, District-Purnea.

10. Abdul Matin Ansari, S/o Md. Habib Ansari, Resident of Village-Kanaharia, P.S. Dagarwa, District-Purnea.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shabbir Ahmad For the Respondent/s :

Abhanjali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 24-01-2019 1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the petitioner and the private- respondent no. 10 has been amicably settled and the respondent no. 10 has withdrawn his claim for appointment on the post of Panchayat teacher in Kanya Majhwa Primary School in Kohila Gram Panchayat under Dagarwa Block of Purnea District, hence there is no impediment in regularization of the services of the petitioner on the post in question.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14878 of 2017 dt.24-01-2019 2/2 2.

Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent no. 10 as also considering the averments made in I.A. no. 7985 of 2018, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent no. 10. It is needless to state that the respondent-State authorities shall take consequential action, in terms of the aforesaid compromise entered into between the petitioner and the respondent no. 10, in accordance with law. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.01.2019 Transmission Date NA