Akhlakur Rahman @ Akbar Mallik v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67764 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2025 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Akhlakur Rahman @ Akbar Mallik S/O Md. Hasibur Rahman R/O MohallaBaignabad, Near Masjid, Ibrahim Colony, P.S- Bihar, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Renuka Ratnakar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 31-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 229 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 308(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the informant alleges that while travelling from Delhi to Biharsharif on 30.03.2025, he was allegedly followed near Bihta-Daniyawan by a Toyota Fortuner and a Mahindra Thar and that firing was allegedly made. It is further alleged that prior to the occurrence, the petitioner had threatened the informant with a demand of a vehicle or Rs. 8 lakh.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that there is no injury on the person of the informant. In fact, a dispute arose when the brother

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67764 of 2025(6) dt.31-01-2026 2/2 of the informant took a vehicle from the petitioner, which is the reason that the petitioner has falsely been implicated. He has also submitted that, except for the one case mentioned in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition, the petitioner has been granted bail in all other cases. The petitioner has been in custody since 30.06.2025.

5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-II, Danapur/concerned court in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 229 of 202, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

7. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available on each and every date till conclusion of the trial.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T