Randhir Choudhary And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46224 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Randhir Choudhary, Son of Keshav Choudhary Resident of Kajipura, Police Station- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur
2. Raghubir Choudhary, Alias Rajbir Choudhary Son Of Keshav Choudhary Resident Of Kajipura, Police Station- Kahalgaon, DistrictBhagalpur
3. Bahadur Choudhary Alias Randeo Choudhary Son Of Raj Kumar Choudhary Resident Of Kajipura, Police Station- Kahalgaon, DistrictBhagalpur'
4. Deepu Choudhary Alias Ran Bijay Choudhary Son Of Raj Kumar Choudhary Resident Of Kajipura, Police Station- Kahalgaon, DistrictBhagalpur
5. Raj Kumar Choudhary Son Of Late Madan Mohan Choudhary Resident Of Kajipura, Police Station- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur
6. Keshav Choudhary Alias Kesho Choudhary @ Keshav Mohan Choudhary Son Of Late Madan Mohan Choudhary Resident Of Kajipura, Police Station- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Jamyanti Devi Wife Of Doman Paswan Resident Of Village- Ramrai Bagh, Police Station- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2017 Heard.
This application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the order dated 08.09.2003 passed in Complaint Case No. 493 (C) of 2001, whereunder the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhagalpur, summoned the seven accused persons, including the petitioners, on inquiry, under Section 204 Cr.P.C., finding prima facie case under Sections 147, 447, 427 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46224 of 2013 (3) dt.08-05-2017 2/2 On going through the impugned order, I do not find any illegality amounting to abuse of process of Court for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise his defence in the trial court at appropriate stage. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T