Sudama Kumar Mahto @ Sudama Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67121 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2022 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Sudama Kumar Mahto @ Sudama Kumar Son Of Ram Ayodhya Mahto R/VPaiga Mitrasen, P.S.- Bheldi, District- Saran At Chapra ( Bihar ) 2.
Dhurup Kumar Mahto @ Dhurup Kumar Son Of Ram Ayodhya Mahto R/VPaiga Mitrasen, P.S.- Bheldi, District- Saran At Chapra ( Bihar ) 3.
Jharilal Mahto @ Jharela Mahto Son Of Ram Ayodhya Mahto R/V- Paiga Mitrasen, P.S.- Bheldi, District- Saran At Chapra ( Bihar ) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. There is recovery of 45 litres of illicit country made liquor from the houses of the petitioners. The petitioners are alleged to have fled away from the place of seizure.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67121 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2022 2/2 petitioners that petitioners were not apprehended from the spot. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have no concern with the recovery of the illicit liquor. Considering the fact that petitioners are owner of the houses from where illicit liquor was recovered, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners stands rejected.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T