Jeeblal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69937 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2022 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Jeeblal Yadav Son Of Late Jito Yadav Village- Sewa Ps- Gidhaur Dist- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Akash Raj For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 312 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Jamui.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons is said to have assaulted the informant and his brother.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69937 of 2023(3) dt.30-01-2024 2/2 there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the petitioner is said to have assaulted the brother of the informant and the injury was found grievous in nature. Hence, he does not deserve privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the fact that the injury was found grievous in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T