← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16958/2025disposed

Ranjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-25Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16958 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Ranjit Kumar Son of Late Rajkishore Sah, Resident of Village/Mohalla Sadar Road, Near Jain Dharamshala, Ward No.11, Police StationForbesganj, District- Araria. 2.

Charchit Anand, Son of Late Lalendra Kishore Narayan, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Flat No.-B-102, Vamika Kunj Apartment, Mundarsah Path, Aakashvani Road, Khajpura, Patna, Thana Shastri Nagar, District- Patna. 3.

Prabhakar Srivastava, Son of Late Chandrashekhar Prasad Srivastava, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Madhu Kunj, Chhakkan Tola, North Mandiri, Police Station- Buddha Colony, District- Patna. 4.

Neeraj Kumar Das, Son of Late Dharanidhar Das, Resident of house no. 196, Vivekananda Sarani, P.S- Garfa, District- Kolkata (W.B). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Secretary, Central Examination Committee, Revenue Board, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Director, Directorate of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Joint Director, Directorate of Plant Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7.

The Deputy Director, Directorate of Plant Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.

8.

The Appointing Authority/Assistant Director, Plant Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Standing Counsel 25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 25-11-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioners have filed the instant application

Patna High Court CWJC No.16958 of 2025(2) dt.25-11-2025 2/3 for the following reliefs:

"1. That the Petitioners above named crave the indulgence of this Hon'ble Court by way of issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the Respondent authorities to grant the Petitioners the financial benefits of five annual increments due on 01.07.2019, 01.07.2020, 01.07.2021, 01.07.2022 and 01.07.2023 by exempting them from passing the departmental examination during the period 11.12.2018 to 01.07.2023, which was admittedly not conducted due to the Respondents' own failure and administrative inaction. And/or any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the instant application be disposed of directing the Director, Directorate of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna (Respondent no.5) to decide the representation of the petitioners within a reasonable time and to grant relief prayed for by the petitioner.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the contents of the petition, the instant application is disposed of directing the petitioners to file their

Patna High Court CWJC No.16958 of 2025(2) dt.25-11-2025 3/3 individual/separate representation before the respondent no.5 within a period of four weeks. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.5 shall decide the same within a period of three months from the date of its filing and in case any amount is found payable, the same shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of passing of the order by the respondent no.5.

6. In case any amount is not found payable/admissible, reasoned orders for the same shall be communicated to the petitioners within the aforesaid period.

7. It is made clear that the Court has not gone into the merits of the case of the petitioners which is to be decided by the respondent concerned.

7. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above observations and directions.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U