Ramjee Prasad @ Natu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2275 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2275 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -693 Year- 2017 (Special Case No. 182 of 2017), Thana -PIRBAHOR District- PATNA ====================================================== Ramjee Prasad @ Natu S/o Umesh Prasad Resident of Village Pothahi, P.S.Punpun, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kaushal Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2017 in connection with Pirbahor P.S. Case No. 693 of 2017 (Special Case No. 182 of 2017) for the alleged offences under Sections 22 and 23 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with alleged recovery of 35 'purias' of ganja weighing in all about 200 grams from the possession of the petitioner, which is denied.

The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Krishna Kant Tripathi, learned District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Patna, in connection with Pirbahor P.S. Case No. 693 of 2017 (Special Case No. 182 of 2017) on the following

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2275 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018 conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T