Ravindra Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14966 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Ravindra Sahani Son of Vaidnnath Sahani, resident of village - Jhitkahiya, P.O. Barwa, P.S.- Lakhaura, District - East Champaran, Motihari. 2.

Motihari Prakhand Matsyajivi Sahyog Samiti Ltd. through its Chairman Ravindra Sahani (Male) aged about 46 years son of Vaidnnath Sahani, resident of village - Jhitkahiya, P.O. - Barwa, P.S. - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran, Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fish Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 3.

The Collector, East Champaran, Motihari.

4.

The Director, Fisheries Department, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Deputy Director,Fisheries Department, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 6.

The District Fisheries Officer-cum-Chief Executive Officer, East Champaran, Motihari.

7.

Ranjan Kumar Nishad, Son of Raj Kumar Nishad, resident of Mohalla - Belbanwa, P.S. - Motihari Town, District - East Champaran, Motihari. 8.

Vinay Kumar Chaudhary, son of Raja Ram Chaudhary, resident of Mohalla - Chhota Bariarpur, Ward No. 37, Near Chini Mil, P.O. - Motihari Court, P.S. - Chhatauni Motihari, District - East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mahasweta Chatterjee For the Respondent/s :

Md. Khurshid Alam (AAG-12) Mr. Asif Kalim, AC to AAG-12 Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AC to AAG-12, Mr. Asif Kalim and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 7, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset,

Patna High Court CWJC No.14966 of 2023(2) dt.28-01-2025 2/2 seeks permission to withdraw the writ application. 3.

Permission is accorded.

4.

Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U