Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51177/2017bail granted

Md. Kaisar Zia v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-13Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51177 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -473 Year- 2015 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Md. Kaisar Zia, Son of Ziauddin @ Md. Ziya Uddin, Resident of VillageGariban Tola, Gulabbagh, POlice Station-Sadar In the District of Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sadar (Purnea) P.S. Case No. 473 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Section 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that he has been in judicial custody since 05.01.2017 and though he is accused in one more case but he is on bail in that case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51177 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017 2/2 Purnea, in connection with Sadar (Purnea) P.S. Case No. 473 of 2015, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T